Reading the “Outsider Within”: Counter-Narratives of Human Rights in Black Women’s Fiction
RT 103: Radical Teaching About Human Rights: Part One
PDF

How to Cite

McCoy, S. (2015). Reading the “Outsider Within”: Counter-Narratives of Human Rights in Black Women’s Fiction. Radical Teacher, 103, 56–70. https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2015.228

Abstract

In Pedagogies of Crossing (2005), M. Jacqui Alexander asserts that human rights are not rights at all; in fact, human rights does little to mitigate the violence perpetuated by late capitalism and the legacies of imperialism and colonialism. Alexander’s point of contention brings to bear the fact that the passing of human rights by the United Nations, among other groups, institutes a “dominant knowledge framework” that does nothing to mitigate the violence perpetuated by unequal power structures (2005; 124). My paper focuses on the function of literary counter-narratives as a useful pedagogical strategy for teaching about human rights in the undergraduate classroom. I frame my analysis within the theoretical debates in critical pedagogy and turn to what Stephen Slemon defines as the “primal scene of colonialist management”—the literary studies classroom—in order to examine the ways in which contemporary black women’s writing problematizes the rhetoric of ‘women’s rights as human rights.’ Despite the common belief that white middle-class readers are consuming ‘exotic’ literature when reading immigrant fiction, as noted by scholars Kanishka Chowdhury (1992) and Inderpal Grewal (2005), I maintain that counter-narratives are useful for intervening in the reproduction of a “patriotic education” (Sheth 2013) that undergirds rights-based discourse, in general, and human rights, in particular, as desirable global policies that mitigate the violence of social injustices. Through primary texts Michelle Cliff’s Abeng (1984), Jamaica Kincaid’s Lucy (1990), and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah (2013), I argue that these texts perform a counter-“cultural technology” in teaching about human rights in literary studies through the lens of “race radicalism” (Melamed 2011), that is cultural production that interrupts the totalizing effects of neocolonial and imperial discourses so often produced in dominant Western literature. Cliff, Kincaid, and Adichie strategically produce oppositional “outsider” narratives that trouble the hegemonic narrative of ‘women’s rights as human rights,’ which implicitly positions women of color in a subordinate position (Mohanty 1986; Spivak 1986).  As black feminist Patricia Hill Collins notes, the “‘outsider within’ status has provided a special standpoint on self, family, and society for Afro-American women.” This standpoint is especially productive for “producing distinctive analyses of race, class, and gender.” I extend Hill Collins’ concept to also include the category of ‘nation.’ Simply put, I argue that the counter-narratives produced by these writers make privy the position of the cultural outsider to American students who have “taken-for-granted assumptions” of human rights discourses as cultural insiders in the U.S. With insight drawn from critical pedagogy, I construct a counter-curriculum that intervenes in a reproduction of global human rights policies constructed through neoliberal ideologies. 

https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2015.228
PDF

References

Adichie, Chimamanda Ngozi. Americanah. 2013. Print.

Alexander, M Jacqui. Pedagogies of Crossing: Meditations on Feminism, Sexual Politics, Memory, and the Sacred. Durham: Duke UP, 2005. Print.

Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2001. 85-126. Print.

Bracher, Mark. Literature and Social Justice: Protest Novels, Cognitive Politics, and Schema Criticism. Austin: UT Press, 2013. Print.

Bransford, John and D. Schwartz. “Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal with Multiple Implications.” Review of Research in Education 24 (1999): 61-100. Internet resource.

Bruns, Cristina Vischer. Why Literature?: The Value of Literary Reading and What It Means for Teaching. 2011. Print.

Chowdhury, Kanishka. "Teaching the Postcolonial Text: Strategies and Interventions." College Literature. (1992): 92. Internet resource.

Cliff, Michelle. Abeng: A Novel. Trumansburg, N.Y: Crossing Press, 1984. Print.

Collins, Patricia H. "Learning from the Outsider Within: the Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought." Social Problems 33.6 (1986): S14-S32. Internet resource.

Clinton, Hillary Rodham. “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights.” Fourth World Conference on Women. United Nations Development Programme. Beijing, China. 5 Sept. 1995. Internet resource.

Donnell, Allison. “Dreaming of Daffodils—Cultural resistance in the narratives of Theory.” Kunapipi 14.2 (1992): 45-52. Internet resource.

Fox, Nicholas Hengen. “Teaching (is not) Activism.” Radical Teacher 94 (2012): 14-23. Internet resource.

Giroux, Henry. “Academic Freedom Under Fire: The Case for Critical Pedagogy.” College Literature 33.4 (2006): 1-42. Internet resource.

Grewal, Inderpal. Transnational America: Feminisms, Diasporas, Neoliberalisms. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005. Print.

Hoad, Neville. African Intimacies Race, Homosexuality, and Globalization. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota, 2007. Print.

hooks, bell. “Toward a Revolutionary Feminist Pedagogy.” Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Boston: South End, 1989. 49-54. Print.

Ilmonen, Kaisa. “Rethinking the Past, Rewriting the History: Counter-Narratives in Michelle Cliff’s Abeng.” The Atlantic Literary Review 3.2 (2002): 110-129. Internet resource.

Kincaid, Jamaica. Lucy. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 2002. Print.

Loomba, Ania. Colonialism/Postcolonialism. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2005. Print.

Melamed, Jodi. Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing Violence in the New Racial Capitalism. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 2011. Print.

Mohanty, Chandra. "Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses." Feminist Review (1988): 61-88. Internet resource.

Nichols, Jennifer J. “‘Poor Visitor’: Mobility as/of Voice in Jamaica Kincaid’s ‘Lucy.’” MELUS 34.4 (2009): 187-207. 21 Oct. 2014. Internet resource.

Poser, Eric. “The Case Against Human Rights.” TheGuardian.com, 4 Dec. 2014. 28 June 2015. < http://www.theguardian.com/news/2014/dec/04/-sp-case-against-human-rights>.

Prentice, Christine. "Out of the Pre-Texts of Imperialism into 'a Future They Must Learn': Decolonizing the Allegorical Subject." Ariel: a Review of International English Literature. 31 (2000): 203-29. Internet resource.

Slemon, Stephen. “Teaching at the End of Empire.” College Literature: Teaching Postcolonial and Commonwealth Literatures 19. 3 (1992): 152-161. Internet resource.

Sheth, Falguni A. “Why Our Best Students Are Totally Oblivious.” Salon.com, 13 September 2013. 17 June 2015. <http://www.salon.com/2013/09/13/why_our_best_students_are_totally_oblivious/>.

Spivak, Gayatri. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. Eds. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin London: Routledge, 1995. 28-37. Print.

Springer, Jennifer T. "Reconfigurations of Caribbean History: Michelle Cliff's Rebel Women." Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism. 7.2 (2007): 43-60. Print.

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. Teaching Literature as Reflective Practice. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 2004. Print.


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1.  The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

2.  Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.


6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.


7. The Author represents and warrants that:

     the Work is the Author’s original work;
     the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
     the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
     the Work has not previously been published;
     the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
     the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
 
8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.