Agroecological Formación in Rural Social Movements

Nils McCune, Juan Reardon, Peter Rosset

Abstract


Among the many sectors currently engaged in struggle against the corporate food system, small farmers play a particularly important role—not only do they constitute a legitimate alternative to global agribusiness, but also they are the heirs to long traditions of local knowledge and practice. In defending peasant agriculture, rural social movements defend popular control over seeds and genetic resources, water, land and territory against the onslaught of globalized financial capital. A framework called food sovereignty has been developed by the international peasant movement La Via Campesina (LVC), to encompass the various elements of a food system alternative based on reclaiming popular resource control, defending small-scale agriculture and traditional knowledge, rebuilding local circuits of food and labor, and recovering the ecological processes that can make farming sustainable. Recognizing the need to develop “movement people” capable of integrating many ecological, social, cultural and political criteria into their organizational activities, LVC increasingly has articulated processes of popular education and consciousness-raising as part of the global social movement for agroecology and food sovereignty. Given the enormous diversity of organizations and actors in LVC, an underlying feature known in Spanish as diálogo de saberes (roughly the equivalent of “dialogue between ways of knowing”) has characterized LVC processes of education, training, formation and exchange in agroecology. The diálogo de saberes takes place at the level of training centers and schools of the LVC organizations, as well as the larger scale of agricultural landscapes and peasant territories. The interactions between peasant, family or communal farmers, their organizations, their youth and their agroecology create social processes that assume the form and dynamic of a social movement in several countries of Latin America.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Castellano et al. 2010. Instituto Universitario Latinoamericano de Agroecología “Paulo Freire”. Documento Fundacional. Editorial Melvin C.A.

Desmarais, A.A. et al 2010. Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature, and community. Halifax: Fernwood Publishers.

Desmarais, A.A. 2007. La Vía Campesina: globalization and the power of peasants. Halifax: Fernwood Publishers.

Ingenieria Sin Fronteras. 2008. Nace el IALA Guarani, una experiencia formativa de La Via Campesina en la Region Sudamericana [online]. Available from: http://admin.isf.es/UserFiles/File/federal/iala_viacampesina(2).pdf [Accessed 20 September 2013].

La Via Campesina 2013. The Jakarta Call [online]. 20 June 2013. Available from: http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/our-conferences-mainmenu-28/6-jakarta-2013/resolutions-and-declarations/1428-the-jakarta-call [Accessed 20 September 2013]

La Via Campesina, et al. 2007a. Agrarian reform in the context of food sovereignty, the right to food, and cultural diversity: land, territory, and dignity. In S. Nimma (ed), Right to food: reforms and approaches. Hyderabad: ICFAI University Press, pp. 34–73.

La Via Campesina 2007b. Declaration of Nyéléni [online]. Available from: http://www.nyeleni.org/spip.php?article290 [Accessed 20 September 2013]

Martínez-Torres, María Elena, and Peter M. Rosset. In press. Diálogo de saberes in La Vía Campesina: Food sovereignty and agroecology. Journal of Peasant Studies (2013, forthcoming, accepted.)

Perfecto, I., J. H. Vandermeer, and A. L. Wright. 2009. Nature’s matrix: linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. Earthscan, London, UK.

Pretty, J.N. et al. 2005. Farm costs and food miles: An assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket. Food Policy 30 (1)

Rojas, A. 2009. Policultivos de la mente: Enseñanzas del campesinado y de la agroecología para la educación en la sustentabilidad. En: Altieri, M. (Ed.) Vertientes del Pensamiento Agroecológico, Fundamentos y Aplicaciones, Pp. 157-182. Medellin: Socla.

Rosset, P.M. 2013. Re-thinking agrarian reform, land and territory in La Via Campesina, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40 (4), 721-775, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2013.826654

Rosset, P. M., and M. E. Martínez-Torres. 2012. Rural social movements and agroecology: context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society 17 (3).

Sevilla Guzman, E. and Woodgate, G. 2013. Agroecology: foundations in agrarian social thought and sociological theory. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37(1): 32-44.

Tarlau, R. 2013. Soviets in the countryside: The MST’s re-making of socialist educational practices in Brazil. Logics of Socialist Education – Explorations of Educational Purpose. Volume 24.

Toledo, V. 1992. Utopía y naturaleza. El nuevo movimiento ecológico de los campesinos e indígenas de América Latina. Nueva Sociedad 122, 72-85.

Torrez, F. 2006. Vía Campesina in Latin America will form an agroecological contingent [online]. Available from: http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/news-from-the-regions-mainmenu-29/184-vcampesina-in-latin-america-will-form-an-agro-ecological-contingent [Accessed 20 September 2013].

Vandermeer, J. et al. 2009. Effects of industrial agriculture on global warming and the potencial of small-scale agroecological techniques to reverse those effects [online]. 20 November 2009. Available from: http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/publications-mainmenu-30/797-effects-of-industrial-agriculture-on-global-warming-and-the-potential-of-small-scale-agroecological [Accessed 1 October 2013].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2014.71

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2014 Nils McCune, Juan Reardon, Peter Rosset

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/

 

Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

University Library System MarkThis journal is published by the University Library SystemUniversity of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.


ISSN 1941-0832 (online)